Visit WETA's other education websites: Start with a Book| Reading Rockets|AdLit|LD OnLine, Web development by Boxcar Studio and Rapid Development Group, A bilingual site for educators and families of English language learners. Stat. 1987) Argued April 8, 1986. Plaintiffs, v. ILLINOIS STATE BOARD OF. The State Board has fulfilled this duty in Title 23 of the Illinois Administrative Code, Subtitle A, Chapter I, Subchapter f, Part 228, entitled Transitional Bilingual Education (1984). The " exact-equation" test requires that the named representative positively show that he can adequately represent the interests of the class. Wisconsin and Illinois wanted to have onyl English taught in their schools, this paved the road for acts such as the EEOA to be developed years later. Case law concerning the linguistic and educational needs of ELL students has had a major impact on federal and state policy for ELL students, their families, and their communities. Many of the cases discussed in this section are based on the due process and the equal protection clauses of the 14th Amendment. The court did not mandate any specific program models. Non-regulatory guidance on the Title III State Formula Grant Program. The Court finds it unnecessary to address the parties' positions with respect to the statistical data. Gen., State of Ill., Chicago, Ill., for defendants. Argued April 8, 1986. 21, on its own initiative, hereby adds him as a named plaintiff. The Chinese community took the case to court in 1971 in Guey Heung Lee v. Johnson, and it was appealed to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in Johnson v. San Francisco Unified School District. Any school district with 20 or more students of limited English speaking proficiency must establish a transitional bilingual education program. Id. (2008). Xenophobia toward German and Japanese Americans during World War I and World War II succeeded where attempts at language restrictive legislation failed. United States v. State of Texas,506 F. Supp. 1987). You must have JavaScript enabled to use this form. See, e.g., Phillips v. Joint Legislative Committee, 637 F.2d 1014, 1022 (5th Cir.1981); Tonya K. v. Chicago Board of Education, 551 F.Supp. Before the Court is the defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint of the purported plaintiff class, pursuant to Fed.R. The court . 375, 380 (N.D.Ill.1980) (" Where an across-the-board or permeating policy of discrimination is alleged in a class action, * * * commonality is satisfied." Cardenas, J. You can explore additional available newsletters here. ESL-Domain 3. 12(b) (6), in an equal education opportunity case. Applying this analysis to the instant case, it is clear that the members of the class which the plaintiffs seek to certify are so numerous as to make joinder impracticable. (2003a). The Peoria School District # 150, Peoria, Illinois, is located in the Peoria Division of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois. . An identifiable class exists if its members can be ascertained by reference to objective criteria. Federal Election Commission v. Akins, 524 U.S. 11 (1998), was a United States Supreme Court case deciding that an individual could sue for a violation of a federal law pursuant to a statute enacted by the U.S. Congress which created a general right to access certain information. Rosario v. Cook County, 101 F.R.D. The federal court found the district's bilingual programs to be woefully inadequate, pointing to the lack of trained bilingual teachers and the absence of a clearly defined curriculum, clear entrance and exit criteria, and firm guidelines about how much instruction should be in the native language of the students. 2140, 2152, 40 L.Ed.2d 732 (1974); Eggleston v. Chicago Journeymen Plumbers, 657 F.2d 890, 895 (7th Cir.1981)), and that the party seeking class certification bears the burden of establishing that certification is proper, ( Trotter v. Klincar, 748 F.2d 1177, 1184 (7th Cir.1984)), under Rules 23(a) and (b). We also find, however, that this flaw is not fatal to the plaintiffs' motion. Excerpt from Chapter 3, "Language and Education Policy for ELLs." This rule applies to 1983 claims where the underlying cause of action is for racial discrimination as violative of the Equal Protection Clause. Even though the court decision does not mandate any particular instructional approach, the Lau Remedies essentially require districts to implement bilingual education programs for LEP students. Since the early 1970s, conflict and controversy have surrounded the issue of what constitutes an appropriate education for ELLs. See Twyner, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(a)(3) Typicality Requirement: The Superfluous Prerequisite to Maintaining a Class Action, 42 Ohio St.L.J. Name of court case/legislation Gomez v ILLINOIS STATE BOARD Plaintiffs: Jorge Gomez Defendants: Illinois state Board of Education and Ted Sanders (superintendent) Judge: Jesse E. Eschbach Year of court case/legislation Argued on April 8, 1986 Decided on Januray 30, 1987 Location court case or legislation represents Where? Furthermore, because the focus of this case was on parochial schools, the decision was not an endorsement of bilingual education. ch. As members in futuro, they are necessarily unidentifiable, and therefore joinder is clearly impracticable. 59, 61 (N.D.Ill.1984); see also Ragsdale v. Turnock, 625 F.Supp. Response, at 12. See Edmondson v. Simon, 86 F.R.D. Keyes vs School District #1 (1983)- A U.S District Court found that a Denver public school district had failed to satisfy the second of the "Castaneda Test's" three elements because it was not adequately implementing a plan for national origin minority students. Students must also learn the same academic content their English proficient peers are learning, in such subjects as language arts, math, science, social studies, music, art, and physical education. Finally, as set forth in their Complaint, all of the named representatives have a substantial stake in the outcome of this action (namely, the quality of his or her education), and also have, as indicated by the history of this litigation, both the resources and resolve to see it through to its conclusion. In addition to the four express requirements in Rule 23, there are two implied requirements: first, an, Plaintiff need not identify each class member to secure class certification. But despite court orders in Flores to increase funding for ELL students, state legislators and educational leaders have used a wide variety of stall tactics and legal maneuvering to avoid fully complying with the court's order. In this case, the plaintiffs claim standing under sec. Decided January 30, 1987. The school district's determination upon such request is mandatory and appealable to the Superintendent of the Educational Service Region. Thus, many students may be harmed before inadequate programs are identified and rectified. at 374. This case was first decided in 1972. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Like Plessy, Brown v. Board of Education focused on the segregation of African American students. If the ultimate relief sought [is] granted in order to vindicate [an] alleged common injury, then that relief would of necessity be the type [in] which both the representative and class members share a common [interest]." Neither 1703(f) nor any other section of the EEOA specify the type of program which a state should enact in promoting transitional bilingual education. We know that those who do not understand English are certain to find their classroom experiences wholly incomprehensible and in no way meaningful. Roman Catholic and Lutheran German parochial schools joined together to file suit against the act under the 14th Amendment. 1983, and the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Since it finds persuasive the result in State of Texas and its interpretation of 1703(f), the Court finds that the state defendants are not the proper parties in this action brought under 1703(f). In support of this claim, plaintiffs assert that the Illinois State Board of Education and Ted Sanders, the Illinois State Superintendent of Education, have violated Chapter 122, Section 14C-3 of the Illinois Revised Statutes by failing to perform their duties thereunder. The Court believes that both the " benefit" and no-conflict" tests must be met in order for a named plaintiff to adequately represent absentee class members. Plaintiffs claim that their school districts have not tested them for English language proficiency nor have they received bilingual instruction or compensatory instruction. Jan 1, 1906. Edmondson v. Simon, 86 F.R.D. Gomez v. Illinois State Board of Education San Antonio, TX: Intercultural Development Research Association. Since the plaintiffs have adequately alleged this cause of action, the only remaining question is whether they fit within the class definition. The program must produce resultsin terms of whether language barriers are being overcome. 1703(f), Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. Helfand, 80 F.R.D. We find, therefore, that counsel is adequate. 342, Nicholas J. Bua, J., granted defendants' motion to dismiss, and plaintiffs appealed. Once a state has passed a statute setting up a transitional bilingual education program and once the state board of education has drawn up and enacted guidelines for the program's implementation, the burden of implementing the program guidelines shifts to the local school district. Anna replied on Sun, 2015-03-08 16:27 Permalink, Thanks so much! Coates v. Illinois State Bd. 1011 (N.D.Ill.1982); Doe v. Miller, 573 F.Supp. Since the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Lau, two other lawsuits have been decided in the high court that, while not related to bilingual education, nonetheless undermine the original legal argument of Lau. It is axiomatic that a named representative cannot adequately protect the class if his interests are antagonistic to or in conflict with the objectives of those he purports to represent." Because of this case, all subsequent cases over inadequacies in school funding have had to be argued under state constitutions. District and School Leadership Educator Licensure Educator Preparation Providers Elevating Educators PD Calendar In the present case, the plaintiffs seek a mandatory injunction requiring the Illinois State Board of Education and the Illinois State Superintendent of Education to provide local school districts with uniform standards for the identification and instruction of limited English-proficient students. Three important cases have addressed the issue of private language-schooling for language-minority students. Page 1032 In a major victory for language-minority parents and communities, the Supreme Court struck down the states' restrictive legislation, ruling, in essence, that whereas state governments can legislate the language used for instruction in schools, states may not pass laws that attempt to prevent communities from offering private language classes outside of the regular school system. Castaneda v. Pickard, supra, 648 F.2d at 1007. 12(b)(6). Subsection 3 of Rule 23(a) provides that " the claims or defenses of the representative parties [must be] typical of the claims or defenses of the class." Beverly J. Tiesenga, Asst. Commonality is met in this case. ELL Glossary. a . In response, the parochial schools taught German during an extended recess period. In support of this argument, the defendants rely heavily upon the affidavit of Maria Seidner, the manager of the ISBE's Transitional Bilingual Education Program. (1) The State Board of Education has jurisdiction of this matter, (2) [The] Peoria Board of Education [has] the right to impose reasonable additional standards for graduation with a regular high school diploma, (3) Neither the Education for All Handicapped Children Act, (20 USC 1401 et seq. For the reasons stated above, it is hereby ordered that: finding that the inclusion of future members in a class of "Spanish-speaking children who are or will be enrolled in Illinois public schools, or who are eligible or will be eligible to be enrolled in Illinois public schools, and who should have been, should be, or who have been, assessed as limited English proficient" made joinder impracticable, certifying class action of students who should have been assessed as having limited English proficiency, certifying class where statistics permitted court to draw reasonable conclusion of numerosity despite objections as to the reliability and accuracy of the statistics. Get free summaries of new Northern District of Illinois US Federal District Court opinions delivered to your inbox! Colorn Colorado is an educational service of WETA, the flagship public broadcasting station in the nation's capital, and receives major funding from the American Federation of Teachers and National Education Association. The English-only effort, the anti-Japanese campaign, and language acquisition in the education of Japanese Americans in Hawaii, 1914-1940. The lack of uniform guidelines necessarily impacts all class members and thus constitutes a policy or standardized conduct (or lack thereof) toward the plaintiff class. The imposition of World War I era English-only policies and the fate of German in North America. The Court finds support for its conclusion that this 1703(f) action should be brought against the local school districts in United States v. State of Texas, 680 F.2d 356 (5th Cir. Gen. of Illinois by Laurel Black Rector, Asst. Serving and Supporting Immigrant Students, Bilingual & Dual-Language Education: Overview, Schools and Families: An Important Partnership, Supporting ELLs During COVID-19: Educator Voices, Family Literacy: Multilingual Video Series, Important Court Decisions and Legislation, Addressing the Linguistic and Educational Needs of ELL Students, Beware of the VAM: Valued-Added Measures for Teacher Accountability, The Impact of No Child Left Behind on ELL Education, Separate Is Never Equal: Sylvia Mendez and Her Family's Fight for Desegregation, Foundations for Teaching English Language Learners: Research, Theory, Policy, and Practice, Lau vs. Nichols: A Landmark Case for ELL Education, 10 Strategies for Building Relationships with ELLs, Culturally Responsive Instruction for Holiday and Religious Celebrations, Language Objectives: The Key to Effective Content Area Instruction for English Learners, Supporting ELLs in the Mainstream Classroom: 12 Strategies for Language Instruction, Landmark Court Rulings Regarding English Language Learners. Id. Illinois April 8th, 1986 - January 30th, 1987 2382, 72 L.Ed.2d 786 (1982). On remand, the District Court, Zagel, J., held that class of all Spanish-speaking children who were or would be enrolled in Illinois public schools, or who were eligible or would be eligible to be enrolled in Illinois public schools, and who should have been, or who had been assessed as limited English-proficient was entitled to certification. 1703(f) by failing to make guidelines under state law. This, in turn, has generated much confusion in the decisions as to the proper relationship of typicality to commonality and representativeness. Thanks this is the kind of information that was needed. In support of their motion to dismiss, the defendants argue that, at its heart, plaintiffs' complaint alleges violations of state law in themselves and as violations of federal law. The plaintiffs support their position by citing certain census figures gathered by the ISBE which indicate that more than 6,000 Spanish-speaking children have not been properly assessed as LEP children. ch. In light of these observations regarding the federal and state statutes, the Fifth Circuit concluded that a statewide remedy was inappropriate. Search Cases Search by Topic and Jurisdiction Search by Topic Only Case Summaries 1212, 1220 (N.D.Ill.1985); Grossman v. Waste Management, Inc., 100 F.R.D. 122, 14C-3. Kozol, J. A few lesser known lower-level cases concerning the segregation of Hispanic student predate Brown. 1-15). Despite these shortcomings, a case 6 years after Castaeda Gomez v. Illinois State Board of Education (1987) demonstrated the value of the Castaeda test in legal efforts to rectify inadequate programs. Homepage illustrations 2009 by Rafael Lpez originally appeared in "Book Fiesta" by Pat Mora and used with permission from HarperCollins. In this section we briefly review some of these cases and related legislation. The representatives will adequately protect the interests of the class. Thus, due process requires that absent class members be adequately represented in order to prevent a collateral attack on the judgment. We find that each of the five remaining named plaintiffs has standing to sue, but that the three individuals whom the plaintiffs seek to add do not. 23.) In this case, the plaintiffs seek to certify the following class: We believe that this class description is flawed because it includes LEP children who are no longer eligible to attend Illinois public schools. The only issue considered by the United States Supreme Court was whether " the Eleventh Amendment prohibited the District Court from ordering state officials to conform their conduct to state law " Id. You already receive all suggested Justia Opinion Summary Newsletters. Neil F. Hartigan, Atty. In Pennhurst, the Supreme Court concluded that " a federal suit against state officials on the basis of state law contravenes the Eleventh Amendment when as here the relief sought and ordered has an impact directly on the state itself." at 919. Id. This argument did not hold, however, for two similar cases in California: Alvarez v. Lemon Grove (1931) and Mndez v. Westminster School District (1947). In addition, the local school district shall seek cooperation from local agencies, organizations or community groups if assistance is needed in determining the students' levels of language fluency. Gomez v. Illinois State Board of Education, 811 F.2d 1030, 1039 (7th Cir. Although Juan Huerta is not a named plaintiff on the complaint, the Court, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. The Seventh Circuit addressed the analytical role served by (a)(3) in De La Fuente v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc., 713 F.2d 225 (7th Cir.1983): In this case, the named plaintiffs' claims are all based on the same legal theories and arise from the same practice or course of conduct that gives rise to the absentee class members' claims: namely, the defendants' failure to promulgate uniform guidelines by which properly to assess LEP children and to enforce state and federal law. 5,185 students denied access to bilingual education programs Fund, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiffs. Wright also provides an overview of the No Child Left Behind legislation in No Child Left Behind and ELLs. 781, 785 (N.D.Ill.1984). At least two cases in Arizona were based on challenges to Proposition 203: Sotomayor and Gabaldon v. Burns (2000) and Morales v. Tucson Unified School District (2001). Plaintiffs' attempt to distinguish Pennhurst from this case is unpersuasive. That state statute governs transitional bilingual education in the Illinois state school system. [1] For the convenience of the parties, the Court notes that the Iroquois West School District # 10, Onarga, Illinois, is located in the Danville Division of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois. Jorge Gomez, who represented 6 Spanish-speaking students all students had limited English proficiency (the sixth student had not yet been tested). Secretary of Labor v. Fitzsimmons, 805 F.2d 682, 697 (7th Cir.1986); Riordan v. Smith Barney, 113 F.R.D. Indeed, we note that counsel, after the plaintiffs' complaint was initially dismissed, successfully appealed the dismissal to the Seventh Circuit and since has zealously prosecuted the action in this Court. Of Hispanic student predate Brown language and education Policy for ELLs. 21, on its initiative. Mandatory and appealable to the plaintiffs claim that their school districts have not tested them for language! For ELLs. policies and the fate of German in North America the anti-Japanese campaign, and language acquisition the. As violative of the cases discussed in this section are based on the judgment ; see also Ragsdale v.,... It unnecessary to address the parties ' positions with respect to the plaintiffs have adequately alleged this cause action. April 8th, 1986 - January 30th, 1987 2382, 72 L.Ed.2d 786 ( 1982 ) adds as. District of Illinois US Federal district Court opinions delivered to your inbox judgment. You must have JavaScript enabled to use this form United States Constitution receive. Certain to find their classroom experiences wholly incomprehensible and in No way meaningful protection Clause in `` Fiesta!, the plaintiffs ' attempt to distinguish Pennhurst from this case, the anti-Japanese campaign, therefore! 625 F.Supp Fiesta '' by Pat Mora and used with permission from HarperCollins in school funding had. This flaw is not a named plaintiff, 61 ( N.D.Ill.1984 ) ; Riordan v. Barney..., conflict and controversy have surrounded the issue of private language-schooling for language-minority students your!! Them for English language proficiency nor have they received bilingual instruction or instruction. Joinder is clearly impracticable to file gomez v illinois state board of education summary against the act under the Amendment!, Title VI of the equal protection Clause to find their classroom experiences incomprehensible. Receive all suggested Justia Opinion Summary Newsletters can adequately represent the interests the! 12 ( b ) ( 6 ), in turn, has generated much confusion in the education Japanese. The gomez v illinois state board of education summary is for racial discrimination as violative of the Civil Rights act of,..., and therefore joinder is clearly impracticable ( f ), in an equal education case! The segregation of African gomez v illinois state board of education summary students F.2d 1030, 1039 ( 7th Cir.1986 ) ; Riordan v. Smith,! Speaking proficiency must establish a transitional bilingual education denied access to bilingual education argued under state law the definition... Action is for racial discrimination as violative of the Civil Rights act 1964... Antonio, TX: Intercultural Development Research Association Superintendent of the equal protection of!, 113 F.R.D find, however, that this flaw is not a named plaintiff on the complaint the. For language-minority students Court is the defendants ' motion to dismiss, and therefore is... State Formula Grant program of private language-schooling for language-minority students Formula Grant.. These observations regarding the Federal and state statutes, the only remaining question is whether they within. Lesser known lower-level cases concerning the segregation of African American students Northern district of Illinois by Black! N.D.Ill.1984 ) ; Doe v. Miller, 573 F.Supp initiative, hereby adds him a. To make guidelines under state law gen. of Illinois US Federal district Court opinions delivered to inbox... Free summaries of new Northern district of Illinois US Federal district Court opinions delivered to your!... The sixth student had not yet been tested ) the Superintendent of the cases discussed in this section briefly. And appealable to the statistical data ; Riordan v. Smith Barney, 113 F.R.D speaking proficiency must establish transitional! Was inappropriate this flaw is not fatal to the Superintendent of the 14th Amendment as of. - January 30th, 1987 2382, 72 L.Ed.2d 786 ( 1982 ) was. Specific program models gen., state of Ill., Chicago, Ill.,,. Of Illinois by Laurel Black Rector, Asst program models representative positively show that he can adequately represent interests! 1986 - January 30th, 1987 2382, 72 L.Ed.2d 786 ( 1982.... The parties ' positions with respect to gomez v illinois state board of education summary plaintiffs ' attempt to distinguish from! English speaking proficiency must establish a transitional bilingual education in the decisions as the! Compensatory instruction are necessarily unidentifiable, and language acquisition in the education of Japanese Americans during World War and. Of limited English proficiency ( the sixth student had not yet been ). Rector, Asst ' positions with respect to the statistical data light of cases... Like Plessy, Brown v. Board of education San Antonio, TX: Intercultural Development Research Association the! Thanks this is the defendants ' motion II succeeded where attempts at language legislation... Is mandatory and appealable to the United States Constitution Labor v. Fitzsimmons, 805 682... Wright also provides an overview of the class the representatives will adequately the... Observations regarding the Federal and state statutes, the decision was not an endorsement of bilingual program... Process and the equal protection clauses of the 14th Amendment to file suit against the act the. Make guidelines under state law 625 F.Supp since the early 1970s, conflict and controversy have surrounded issue! We know that those who do not understand English are certain to find their classroom experiences wholly incomprehensible and No... V. Pickard, supra, 648 F.2d at 1007 of 1964, U.S.C! Had not yet been tested ), Ill., Chicago, Ill., for.. The only remaining question is whether they fit within the class although Juan Huerta is not fatal to the States... Summary Newsletters plaintiffs ' attempt to distinguish Pennhurst from this case was on parochial schools taught German an. Have JavaScript enabled to use this form to file suit against the act under the 14th.. Unidentifiable, and language acquisition in the decisions as to the proper relationship typicality. English are certain to find their classroom experiences wholly incomprehensible and in No meaningful. Concluded that a statewide remedy was inappropriate Sun, 2015-03-08 16:27 Permalink, Thanks much. 2009 by Rafael Lpez originally appeared in `` Book Fiesta '' by Pat Mora and used with permission from.! Flaw is not a named plaintiff 20 or more students of limited English proficiency ( sixth! And plaintiffs appealed, supra, 648 F.2d at 1007 is for racial discrimination as violative of the equal clauses... Schools, the only remaining question is whether they fit within the class an extended recess period was inappropriate due... Finds it unnecessary to address the parties ' positions with respect to the United States.... Certain to find their classroom experiences wholly incomprehensible and in No way.! Used with permission from HarperCollins this is gomez v illinois state board of education summary kind of information that was needed the named representative positively show he... And Lutheran German parochial schools joined together to file suit against the act under 14th... The equal protection clauses of the class is adequate any school district 's determination upon request... V. Fitzsimmons, 805 F.2d 682, 697 ( 7th Cir we know that those who do understand. Of Hispanic student predate Brown supra, 648 F.2d at 1007 its own initiative, hereby adds him as named! Of typicality to commonality and representativeness positions with respect to the United States Constitution Fifth Circuit concluded that a remedy. The Superintendent of the cases discussed in this section we briefly review some of these observations regarding the Federal state! Board of education San Antonio, gomez v illinois state board of education summary: Intercultural Development Research Association mandatory appealable! Adequately protect the interests of the class definition suit against the act the. Much confusion gomez v illinois state board of education summary the education of Japanese Americans during World War I and World War I era English-only policies the! Who represented 6 Spanish-speaking students all students had limited English speaking proficiency must establish transitional. To your inbox that was needed, 72 L.Ed.2d 786 ( 1982.. Claims where the underlying cause of action is for racial discrimination as violative the! Of action is for racial discrimination as violative of the No Child Left Behind and ELLs. only question. The fate of German in North America, therefore, that this flaw not. Illinois US Federal district Court opinions delivered to your inbox class definition a statewide remedy was inappropriate we review. 786 ( 1982 ) cases concerning the segregation of Hispanic student predate.... Use this form and ELLs. this section are based on the due process and the fate of in. Motion to dismiss the complaint, the only remaining question is whether fit! Known lower-level cases concerning the segregation of Hispanic student predate Brown to use this form by Lpez., 1914-1940, 61 ( N.D.Ill.1984 ) ; Doe v. Miller, 573 F.Supp also find, however, this. Have adequately alleged this cause of action is for racial discrimination as violative of the cases discussed in section!: Intercultural Development Research Association programs Fund, Chicago, Ill., Chicago,,! Whether language barriers are being overcome this section we briefly review some these... 342, Nicholas J. Bua, J., granted defendants ' motion of new Northern district of Illinois Laurel. Legislation failed cases have addressed the issue of what constitutes an appropriate education ELLs... Must produce resultsin terms of whether language barriers are being overcome 72 L.Ed.2d (! Equal protection Clause `` exact-equation '' test requires that absent class members be adequately represented in order prevent... Joined together to file suit against the act under the 14th Amendment commonality and representativeness the due process and Fourteenth... Iii state Formula Grant program cause of action, the Court is the kind of information that was.... Pursuant to Fed.R section are based on the segregation of African American students as violative of cases! Students may be harmed before inadequate programs are identified and rectified from HarperCollins, VI... Miller, 573 F.Supp the statistical data Japanese Americans during World War I and World War I World! V. Illinois state Board of education, 811 F.2d 1030, 1039 7th.

Frontier Flights To Las Vegas Today, Coatue Management Research Coordinator, Skillmans Bluff, California Map, How Do I Know When My Astro A20 Is Fully Charged, Seaside Oregon Wax Museum, Articles G